Crude Oil Price by oil-price.net

Oil and Gas Energy News Update

Showing posts with label deepwater. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deepwater. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Chevron Strikes Oil in Deepwater GOM

- Chevron Strikes Oil in Deepwater GOM

Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Chevron Corp.

Chevron announced a new oil discovery at the Moccasin prospect in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico.

The Keathley Canyon Block 736 Well No. 1 encountered more than 380 feet of net pay in the Lower Tertiary Wilcox Sands. The well is located approximately 216 miles off the Louisiana coast in 6,759 feet of water and was drilled to a depth of 31,545 feet.

"The Moccasin discovery underscores the importance of the deepwater Gulf of Mexico as a source of domestic energy for the United States and as a focus area for Chevron's worldwide exploration portfolio," said George Kirkland, vice chairman, Chevron Corporation. "Moccasin is an important addition to our queue of high-quality opportunities around the globe."

Chevron began drilling the Moccasin well in March 2010. That activity was stopped in June 2010 when the U.S. government imposed a moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Drilling resumed in March 2011 after the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement approved Chevron's revised drilling permit application.

The well results are still being evaluated, and additional work will be needed to determine the extent of the resource. Chevron, with a 43.75 percent working interest in the prospect, was the operator of the Moccasin discovery well. Other Moccasin owners are BP, with 43.75 percent, and Samson Offshore Company, with 12.5 percent.

Chevron is one of the largest leaseholders in the Gulf of Mexico and is currently developing the $7.5 billion Jack/St. Malo and the $4.1 billion Big Foot projects.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Friday, September 2, 2011

Halliburton Sues BP In Texas - Alleges Misrepresentation

- Halliburton Files Lawsuit Against BP

Friday, September 02, 2011
Halliburton Co.

On September 1, 2011, Halliburton filed claims against BP in Texas state court for negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement and defamation related to the April 20, 2010, Macondo incident. Halliburton has also moved to amend its claims against BP in the multi-district litigation in New Orleans, Louisiana, to include fraud.

These allegations are based upon BP providing Halliburton with inaccurate information prior to performing cementing services on April 19, 2010, and BP's use of and omission of that information in subsequent public statements, filings and governmental investigations.

Halliburton has learned that BP provided Halliburton inaccurate information about the actual location of hydrocarbon zones in the Macondo well. The actual location of the hydrocarbon zones is critical information required prior to performing cementing services and is necessary to achieve desired cement placement.

Halliburton remains confident that all the work it performed with respect to the Macondo well was completed in accordance with BP's specifications for its well construction plan and instructions, and that Halliburton is fully indemnified under the contract.


--------------------------------------------------------------

Halliburton Sues BP In Texas - Alleges Misrepresentation

Friday, September 02, 2011
Dow Jones Newswires
by Melodie Warner

Halliburton filed a negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement and defamation lawsuit against BP in Texas state court related to the April 2010 Macondo explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Halliburton has also moved to amend its multi-district litigation in New Orleans to include fraud claims against BP.

The oilfield-services company alleges BP provided Halliburton with inaccurate information--such as the actual location of hydrocarbon zones in the Macondo well--before cementing services began on April 19, 2010. Halliburton also claims BP has used and omitted that information in subsequent public statements, filings and governmental investigations.

"This lawsuit is the latest attempt by Halliburton to divert attention from its role in the Deepwater Horizon incident and its failure to meet its responsibilities," BP said in a statement. The energy giant said it has accepted responsibility for responding to the spill and is accordingly paying costs and compensation. BP "expects other parties to accept their responsibilities and bear their share of the costs," the statement said.

Last fall, BP released a report that largely faulted Transocean, the owner of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, and Halliburton for last year's disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil spill. While government investigations have generally assigned blame to both BP and its contractors, Transocean disclosed an internal investigation in June that focused almost entirely on decisions made by BP.

Halliburton said Friday it remains confident that all the work it performed was completed in accordance with BP's specifications, and that Halliburton is fully indemnified under the contract.

Shares of Halliburton were trading 2.8% lower at $41.83 moments after the opening bell.

Copyright (c) 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.


LINK 
The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines



Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Monday, August 8, 2011

ONGC In Talks to Sell Indian Ocean Deepwater Stakes - FT

- ONGC In Talks to Sell Indian Ocean Deepwater Stakes - FT

Monday, August 08, 2011
Dow Jones Newswires

India's Oil & Natural Gas Corp. (ONGC) is talking to Shell, BG Group and Eni to sell stakes in its Indian Ocean deepwater developments, the Financial Times reported Sunday, citing ONGC's chairman AK Hazarika.

ONGC is already co-operating with Shell, BG and Eni in a number of other blocks, and talks had been under way for some time. ONGC seeks a partner on the technical front to expand the development of its 85 deepwater blocks in the Indian Ocean, Hazarika said in the report available on the FT website, without giving a deadline for the deal.

The company was willing to give away up to 30% of its assets in exchange for technical expertise, Hazarika said, according to the report.

Shell and BG declined comment, while Eni didn't respond, the FT said.


Copyright (c) 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Monday, July 18, 2011

Lawsuit Against BP Tossed

- Lawsuit Against BP Tossed

Monday, July 18, 2011
Houston Chronicle
by Tom Fowler

A federal judge has dismissed racketeering claims brought by Gulf Coast businesses and residents against BP for last year's massive oil spill.

The plaintiffs alleged that BP defrauded regulators in connection with the safety of its drilling operations and its response to the spill. They invoked the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a law typically used against organized crime.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier dismissed the claims Friday. The decision does not affect other damage claims still pending from the same plaintiffs.

The judge also set aside a lawsuit filed against BP by Anadarko Petroleum Corp., one of its partners on the Macondo well. He ruled that the two companies' prior contractual agreements required them to try to settle such disputes through arbitration before suing.

Anadarko argued that BP had voided that requirement by, among other things, demanding that Anadarko produce evidence in the civil case.

"We respect today's decision, which does nothing to diminish our claims; it simply addresses the venue in which they may be resolved," Anadarko spokesman John Christiansen said in a statement.

Anadarko has not set aside funds explicitly for possible spill-related liabilities but has said during analyst meetings that it has up to $3.4 billion in cash on hand and a $5 billion credit line it acquired after the accident.

BP, which has set aside more than $40 billion in reserves, said in a prepared statement after the ruling that Anadarko shares liability under the federal Oil Pollution Act.

"Anadarko has blatantly disregarded its responsibilities to the residents of the Gulf Coast by failing to pay its fair share of the costs relating to the accident and resulting spill," it said. "BP remains focused on ensuring that Anadarko lives up to its obligations as a co-leasehold owner of the Macondo prospect and as a 'responsible party' under OPA."

Copyright (c) 2011, Houston Chronicle. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

LINK 
The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines


Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Anadarko Announces Lucius Unitization

- Anadarko Announces Lucius Unitization

Monday, July 18, 2011                                               
Anadarko Petroleum Corp.

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. on Monday announced the finalization of a unitization agreement with Exxon Mobil Corp. and co-owners to develop the Lucius field.

The unitization includes portions of Keathley Canyon blocks 874, 875, 918 and 919 in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Anadarko will operate the unit with a 35-percent working interest. Following the unitization agreement, the Lucius interest owners entered into an agreement with the Hadrian South co-venturers whereby natural gas produced from the Hadrian South field will be processed through the Lucius facility in return for a production-handling fee and reimbursement for any required facility upgrades.

"As a result of these agreements, we expect Lucius to be among the most economically efficient projects in our portfolio, while providing important infrastructure in an emerging area of the Gulf of Mexico," said Al Walker, Anadarko President and Chief Operating Officer. "We've already placed orders for the long-lead items, including the truss spar floating production facility, which will have a capacity of more than 80,000 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) and 450 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. We look forward to working with our new co-owners and anticipate sanctioning the project later this year, with first production expected in 2014."

Anadarko and the co-owners also recently completed an extended well test at the Lucius discovery that provided assurance regarding the flow rates and excellent reservoir characteristics of the field. With equipment-constrained rates in excess of 15,000 BOPD of high-quality oil (29 degrees API gravity), the test provided additional confidence in Anadarko's previous resource estimates and indicated that Lucius can be developed with a minimal number of wells.

Co-owners in the Lucius unit include Plains Exploration & Production Co. with a 23.3-percent working interest; Exxon Mobil Corp. with a 15-percent working interest; Apache Deepwater LLC, a subsidiary of Apache Corp. with an 11.7-percent working interest; Petrobras with a 9.6-percent working interest; and Eni Petroleum with a 5.4-percent working interest.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Devin International Names New Deepwater Projects Coordinator

- Devin International Names New Deepwater Projects Coordinator

Thursday, July 07, 2011
Devin International

Devin International has promoted Craig Latch to Deepwater Projects Coordinator, Gulf of Mexico, announced Joe Miller, Vice President of Sales and Marketing.

Latch will coordinate the initiation and execution of equipment orders for customers' projects from Devin International's Lafayette, La. office. He previously served as International Projects Coordinator for the company.

"Craig's proven track record of organizational and leadership skills makes him the perfect fit to fill this position," said Miller." He has proven himself effective through consistent personal performance and continued growth for Devin."

Latch earned a bachelor's and a master's degree in communications/ marketing from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. He is a member of Young Professionals in Energy and the Intervention and Coiled Tubing Association

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

GE Unit Receives $45M Contract to supply TLP Tensioner System for Chevron

- GE Unit Receives $45M Contract to supply TLP Tensioner System for Chevron



Jul 6, 2011

GE (NYSE:GE) Oil & Gas' Drilling & Production business has been awarded a contract of approximately $45M to supply and service the industry's largest tension leg platform to Chevron (NYSE:CVX) for deployment in its Big Foot oil and gas field in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Installation of the TLP is scheduled to begin in November 2012 and first oil is expected in 2014.

Chevron has a potential upside of 17.1% based on a current price of $104.86 and an average consensus analyst price target of $122.75.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Thursday, June 30, 2011

ABS, China Classification Society Meet on Deepwater China

- ABS, China Classification Society Meet on Deepwater China

Thursday, June 30, 2011
ABS

The growing importance of deepwater exploration and production developments offshore China led classification societies ABS and CCS (China Classification Society) to conduct a joint “Deepsea Developments in the China Offshore Industry” meeting on 17 June 2011. The meeting, which was held in Beijing, brought together leading offshore industry professionals to discuss a wide range of energy development issues.

More than 100 representatives from the Chinese government, shipbuilders, designers, research institutes, energy corporations and universities attended. Topics included a discussion of the global energy market outlook from research firm Infield Systems, the challenges and latest solutions proposed for deepwater development from offshore solutions technology leader Horton Wison and a look at risk-based operations and new approaches toward minimizing risk with deepwater exploration from global engineering, procurement and construction firm Worley Parsons.

ABS discussed the regulatory changes resulting from the Macondo incident in the Gulf of Mexico and the broader impact on regulatory schemes worldwide while CCS highlighted the impact of deepsea development on the technology standards for the region’s offshore industry.

“This industry meeting illustrates the cooperative spirit between ABS and CCS,” says ABS CEO and President Christopher J. Wiernicki. “Over the past decade, China has significantly grown in its importance to both the maritime and offshore industries. With our experience and leadership in setting standards for the offshore industry, ABS can bring valuable assistance to the region as it faces new exploration and production challenges.”

It is this experience that led to ABS’ and CCS’ joint involvement on the massive Liwan 3-1 gas field development in the South China Sea. The Liwan 3-1 development is China’s largest offshore natural gas discovery to date and will be the first deepwater development project.

It is widely known that China has begun to invest heavily in deepsea exploration as the country’s economic growth demands more energy resources. “We are helping to support our country’s efforts by providing the technical guidance necessary for safe and efficient exploration,” said Li Kejun, CCS Chairman and President. “This industry meeting shows our commitment to helping achieve deepsea technological advancements in the region.”

Also in attendance was President of the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI) Guangqin Zhang. While China’s shipbuilding industry has been challenged by the global economic recession, the accomplishments of China’s shipbuilding industry are well known, as is its rapid diversification into the gas and offshore sectors. “Meetings such as these contribute to the intellectual discussion and allow for the introduction of new offshore technologies in our shipyards, new technologies that will position the region for successful deepsea exploration,” Zhang said.

Calling it a new era in deepwater development for China, Vice Chief Engineer for China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) Hengyi Zeng concluded the meeting by saying “we appreciate both class societies and the years of support and cooperation they have provided to expand China’s offshore development.”

In November 2010, ABS and CCS strengthened their collaborative efforts, formally established in 1993, by entering into a new Cooperative Agreement with offshore as a key area of focus for the two classification societies.

As a further demonstration of ABS’ long-term commitment to the Greater China region, in May 2011, ABS established the ABS China Offshore Technology Center (COTC) in partnership with Shanghai Jiaotong University (SJTU). While the research efforts will support development activities in the Greater China region, applied research will also be conducted on a wide range of energy development issues. The COTC is ABS’ fourth offshore-focused research center, which are strategically positioned around the world to support clients’ activities.

The ABS Greater China Division has more than 500 employees operating from more than 30 offices across mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Founded in 1862, ABS is a leading international classification society devoted to promoting the security of life, property and the marine environment through the development and verification of standards for the design, construction and operational maintenance of marine-related facilities.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Nova Scotia Calls For Deepwater Bids

- Nova Scotia Calls For Deepwater Bids

Thursday, June 30, 2011
CNSOPB

The Canada - Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) has issued Call for Bids NS11-1. The Call consists of eight deep water parcels offshore Nova Scotia, some of which were nominated by industry. Bids must be received by Tuesday, January 10, 2012, 4:00 p.m. Atlantic Time. The Board will only accept bids from companies that have experience in the drilling of exploration wells in water depths greater than 800 meters in the past ten years.

“This Call for Bids includes deepwater parcels located in a largely unexplored area of Nova Scotia’s offshore,” says Stuart Pinks, Board CEO. “The Offshore Energy Technical Research Association’s (OETR) Play Fairway Analysis provides strong evidence that this area could have significant oil potential. The parcels are located in a geological region that contains many large undrilled structures that could trap oil or gas.”

The Board has made detailed geoscientific assessments and regulatory information associated with the parcels available on its website.

The successful bidder(s) will be awarded an Exploration Licence (EL) subject to federal and provincial Ministerial approval.

The CNSOPB is preparing a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for exploration activities in areas identified in this Call for Bids which will include two public comment periods; one on the scope of the assessment and the other public comment period on the draft SEA report. The SEA will identify any environmental issues that a successful bidder would need to address when performing a project-specific environmental assessment which is required before any activity can begin.

In addition, the public is invited to submit written comments to the Board on the lands included in this Call for Bids. Written submissions must be received by Tuesday, December 20, 2011, 4:00 p.m. Atlantic Time. Such submissions will be considered by the Board before an Exploration Licence is issued.

Written submissions from the public should be sent to:

Director, Resources & Rights, Canada - Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board
1791 Barrington Street
6th Floor, TD Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 3K9
or via e-mail at callforbids@cnsopb.ns.ca.

Further information about the Call for Bids can be found on the Board’s web site at www.cnsopb.ns.ca.

The Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board is the independent joint agency of the Governments of Canada and Nova Scotia responsible for the regulation of petroleum activities and resources offshore Nova Scotia.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

HWCG Makes Headway in Expanding Deepwater Capabilities

- HWCG Makes Headway in Expanding Deepwater Capabilities

Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Helix Well Containment Group

The Helix Well Containment Group (HWCG) announced that it is now capable to respond to a subsea well containment incident in water depths of up to 10,000 feet.

The consortium previously announced its intention to achieve this milestone by mid-summer, and has achieved this ahead of schedule. Previously, it had capabilities to operate in water depths of up to 8,000 feet.

HWCG is a consortium of 24 deepwater operators in the Gulf of Mexico that have come together with the common goal of expanding capabilities to quickly and comprehensively respond to subsea well incidents to protect employees, communities and the environment.

"Combining ultra-deep water depth capability with a 15,000 pounds per square inch-gauge (psig) intervention capping stack, the HWCG consortium has the technology, expertise and resources of a diverse group of companies to respond immediately in the unlikely event that a deepwater well's blowout preventer fails to operate as designed," said David Coatney, HWCG's Managing Director.

Coatney was recently named HWCG Managing Director in May. He has more than 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, both in the United States and overseas. In previous roles, Coatney has served as an international upstream oil and gas asset consultant, Vice President of Production for Swift Energy and in various management and engineering capacities for Marathon Oil Company, where he worked for 29 years.

Coatney has been integrally involved in emergency preparedness and response for more than 20 years. He has acted as an Incident Commander—both domestically and abroad—and has led many successful responses in operational, natural disaster, well control and civil unrest incidents.

"Dave's combined expertise in drilling, production, offshore operations and incident response will be a strong asset to HWCG," said John Weust, HWCG's Steering Committee Chair. "I am confident he will play a significant and positive role in the ongoing operations of HWCG, in addition to enhancing the group's position in responding to the future needs of the industry."

Coatney holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Louisiana State University. He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the American Petroleum Institute and the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Transocean Briefs Investigation Report on Causes of Macondo Incident

- Transocean Briefs Investigation Report on Causes of Macondo Incident

Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Transocean Ltd.

Transocean announced the release of an internal investigation report on the causes of the April 20, 2010, Macondo well incident in the Gulf of Mexico.

Following the incident, Transocean commissioned an internal investigation team comprised of experts from relevant technical fields and specialists in accident investigation to gather, review, and analyze the facts and information surrounding the incident to determine its causes.

The report concludes that the Macondo incident was the result of a succession of interrelated well design, construction, and temporary abandonment decisions that compromised the integrity of the well and compounded the likelihood of its failure. The decisions, many made by the operator, BP, in the two weeks leading up to the incident, were driven by BP's knowledge that the geological window for safe drilling was becoming increasingly narrow. Specifically, BP was concerned that downhole pressure -- whether exerted by heavy drilling mud used to maintain well control or by pumping cement to seal the well -- would exceed the fracture gradient and result in fluid losses to the formation, thus costing money and jeopardizing future production of oil.

The Transocean investigation team traced the causes of the Macondo incident to four overarching issues:
  • Risk Management and Communication: Evidence indicates that BP failed to properly assess, manage and communicate risk to its contractors. For example, it did not properly communicate to the drill crew the absence of adequate testing on the cement or the uncertainty surrounding critical tests and procedures used to confirm the integrity of the barriers intended to inhibit the flow of hydrocarbons into the well. It is the view of the investigation team that the actions of the drill crew on April 20, 2010, reflected the crew's understanding that the well had been properly cemented and successfully tested.
  • Well Design and Construction: The precipitating cause of the Macondo incident was the failure of the downhole cement to isolate the reservoir, which allowed hydrocarbons to enter the wellbore. Without the failure of the cement barrier, hydrocarbons would not have entered the well or reached the rig. While drilling the Macondo well, BP experienced both lost circulation events and kicks and stopped short of the well's planned total depth because of an increasingly narrow window for safe drilling, specifically a limited margin between the pore pressure and fracture gradients. In the context of these delicate conditions, cementing a long-string casing would increase the risk of exceeding the margin for safe drilling. But rather than adjusting the production casing design to avoid this risk, BP adopted a technically complex nitrogen foam cement program that allowed it to retain its original casing design. The resulting cement program was of minimal quantity, left little margin for error, and was not tested adequately before or after the cementing operation. Further, the integrity of the cement may have been compromised by contamination, instability and an inadequate number of devices used to center the casing in the wellbore.
  • Risk Assessment and Process Safety: Based on the evidence, the investigation team determined that BP failed to properly require or confirm critical cement tests or conduct adequate risk assessments during various operations at Macondo. Halliburton and BP did not adequately test the cement slurry program, despite the inherent complexity, difficulties and risks associated with the design and implementation of the program and some test data showing that the cement would not be stable. BP also failed to assess the risk of the temporary abandonment procedure used at Macondo, generating at least five different temporary abandonment plans for the Macondo well between April 12, 2010 and April 20, 2010. After this series of last-minute alterations, BP proceeded with a temporary abandonment plan that created unnecessary risk and did not have the required approval by the MMS. Most significantly, the final plan called for underbalancing the well before conducting a negative pressure test to verify the integrity of the downhole cement or setting a cement plug to act as an additional barrier to flow. It does not appear that BP used risk assessment procedures or prepared Management of Change documents for these decisions or otherwise addressed these risks and the potential adverse effects on personnel and process safety.

Operations
  • Negative Pressure Test: The results of the critical negative pressure test were misinterpreted. Post-incident investigation determined that the negative test was inadequately set up because of displacement calculation errors, a lack of adequate fluid volume monitoring, and a lack of management of change discipline when the well monitoring arrangements were switched during the test. It is now apparent that the negative pressure test results should not have been approved, but no one involved in the negative pressure test recognized the errors. BP approved the negative pressure test results and decided to move forward with temporary abandonment. The well became underbalanced during the final displacement, and hydrocarbons began entering the wellbore through the faulty cement barrier and a float collar that likely failed to convert. None of the individuals monitoring the well, including the Transocean drill crew, initially detected the influx.
  • Well Control: With the benefit of hindsight and a thorough analysis of the data available to the investigation team, several indications of an influx during final displacement operations can be identified. Given the death of the members of the drill crew and the loss of the rig and its monitoring systems, it is not known which information the drill crew was monitoring or why the drill crew did not detect a pressure anomaly until approximately 9:30 p.m. on April 20, 2010. At 9:30 p.m., the drill crew acted to evaluate an anomaly. Upon detecting an influx of hydrocarbon by use of the trip tank, the drill crew undertook well-control activities that were consistent with their training including the activation of various components of the BOP. By the time actions were taken, hydrocarbons had risen above the blowout preventer and into the riser, resulting in a massive release of gas and other fluids that overwhelmed the mud gas separator system and released high volumes of gas onto the aft deck of the rig. The resulting ignition of this gas cloud was inevitable.
  • Blowout Preventer (BOP): Forensic evidence from independent post-incident testing by Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and evaluation by the Transocean investigation team confirm that the Deepwater Horizon BOP was properly maintained and operated. However, it was overcome by the extreme dynamic flow, the force of which pushed the drill pipe upward, washed or eroded the drill pipe and other rubber and metal elements, and forced the drill pipe to bow within the BOP. This prevented the BOP from completely shearing the drill pipe and sealing the well.
  • Alarms, Muster, and Evacuation: In the explosions and fire, the general alarm was activated, and appropriate emergency actions were taken by the Deepwater Horizon marine crew. The 115 personnel who survived the initial blast mustered and evacuated the rig to the offshore supply vessel Damon B. Bankston.

The Transocean internal investigation team began its work in the days immediately following the incident. Through an extensive investigation, the team interviewed witnesses, reviewed available information regarding well design and execution, examined well monitoring data that had been transmitted real-time from the rig to BP, consulted industry and technical experts, and evaluated available physical evidence and third-party testing reports.

The loss of evidence with the rig and the unavailability of certain witnesses limited the investigation and analysis in some areas. The team used its cumulative years of experience but did not speculate in the absence of evidence. The report of the team does not represent the legal position of Transocean, nor does it attempt to assign legal responsibility or fault.

LINK 
The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Monday, June 20, 2011

BP, Weatherford In Settlement on Deepwater Horizon

- BP, Weatherford In Settlement on Deepwater Horizon

Monday, June 20, 2011
Dow Jones Newswires
by Drew FitzGerald

BP on Monday reached a settlement with Weatherford's U.S. subsidiary that indemnifies the oil-services company from future Deepwater Horizon-related disaster claims.

Under the deal, Weatherford agreed to pay BP $75 million to spend on its Gulf Coast recovery fund. The entire cost of the settlement is being funded by insurance policies Weatherford had in place when the disaster happened.

The deal ties up another end in a web of litigation for companies that worked on the drilling rig, which exploded last year and caused one of the largest oil spills in U.S. history. Weatherford provided BP with products and services for the Macondo oil well, along with rig-owner Transocean and contractor Halliburton.

Under the latest agreement, BP indemnified Weatherford from all current and future environmental, pollution, personal, business, property and economic loss claims arising from the accident.

Separately, Transocean said Friday that insurers of its sunken rig have asked a federal judge to decide if BP and other owners of the doomed Macondo well are entitled to any coverage for the accident.

Copyright (c) 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

LINK 
The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Friday, June 17, 2011

Aker Wins Daewoo Contract for New Deepwater Drillship

- Aker Wins Daewoo Contract for New Deepwater Drillship

Friday, June 17, 2011
Aker Solutions

Aker Solutions has won a contract from Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Equipment to supply a complete drilling equipment package for a new deepwater drillship.

The contract is worth about NOK 540 million. The drill ship will be owned and operated by Tungsten Explorer Company, a subsidiary of Vantage Drilling.

"We are very pleased to have won another contract to deliver our deepwater drilling equipment and systems, which underlines our strong and fruitful relationships with the yard and the team at Vantage Drilling," said Thor Arne Håverstad, executive vice president and head of Aker Solutions' drilling technologies business.

Bill Thomson, VP Assets and Engineering at Vantage Drilling said, "We appreciate the commitment by Aker Solutions to provide a drilling package that meets and exceeds our expectations. This will be the seventh drilling package from Aker Solutions that Vantage will be involved in. As such Aker Solutions' commitment to deliver not only an excellent service during the construction but to provide a first-class customer service when in operations is important to the success of Vantage Drilling."

The equipment will mainly be delivered in 2012.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Thursday, June 16, 2011

ConocoPhillips Reaches Deepwater Exploration Deal with Bangladesh

- ConocoPhillips Reaches Deepwater Exploration Deal with Bangladesh



Jun 16, 2011

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) announced it has signed a deal today with the Government of Bangladesh and Petrobangla, the Bangladeshi state oil company, to explore for oil in two deepwater blocks in the Bay of Bengal.

Larry Archibald, senior vice-president, Exploration and Business Development said, "ConocoPhillips is pleased to become part of the Bangladesh oil and gas community. We fully expect that this contract signing will be the first step in a long and successful relationship between ConocoPhillips, Petrobangla and the Government of Bangladesh."

Bangladesh's deepwater area of the Bay of Bengal is virtually unexplored. The 2 blocks are located in an area with a depth of 3,300 to 5,000 feet of water, and are about 175 miles from the port city of Chittagong.

ConocoPhillips has a potential upside of 20.6% based on a current price of $70.57 and an average consensus analyst price target of $85.13.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

ExxonMobil Touts Three Deepwater GOM Discoveries

- ExxonMobil Touts Three Deepwater GOM Discoveries

Wednesday, June 08, 2011
ExxonMobil Corp.

ExxonMobil announced two major oil discoveries and a gas discovery in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico after drilling the company's first post-moratorium deepwater exploration well.

The KC919-3 wildcat well confirmed the presence of a second oil accumulation in Keathley Canyon block 919. The well encountered more than 475 feet of net oil pay and a minor amount of gas in predominantly Pliocene high-quality sandstone reservoirs. The well, which is continuing to drill deeper, is located 250 miles southwest of New Orleans in approximately 7,000 feet of water.

Drilling in early 2010 encountered oil and natural gas at Hadrian North in KC919 and extending into KC918, with over 550 feet of net oil pay and a minor amount of gas in high-quality Pliocene and Upper Miocene sandstone reservoirs.

ExxonMobil encountered 200 feet of natural gas pay in Pliocene sandstone reservoirs at its Hadrian South prospect in Keathley Canyon block 964 during drilling in 2009.

"We estimate a recoverable resource of more than 700 million barrels of oil equivalent combined in our Keathley Canyon blocks," said Steve Greenlee, president of ExxonMobil Exploration Company. "This is one of the largest discoveries in the Gulf of Mexico in the last decade. More than 85 percent of the resource is oil with additional upside potential."

"We plan to work with our joint venture partners and other lessees in the area to determine the best way to safely develop these resources as rapidly as possible," Greenlee said.

ExxonMobil is the operator of KC918, KC919, KC963 and KC964 with 50 percent working interest. Eni Petroleum US LLC and Petrobras America Inc. each hold a 25 percent working interest in KC919, KC963 and KC964. Petrobras America Inc. holds a 50 percent working interest in KC918.

Over the past decade, ExxonMobil has drilled 36 deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico in water ranging from 4,000 feet to 8,700 feet.

"As one of the largest lease holders in the Gulf of Mexico with interests in over 370 leases, we are committed to the continued safe exploration and development of this important national resource," Greenlee said.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Friday, June 3, 2011

Witnesses Say Gulf Drilling Ban Was A Harsh Blow

- Witnesses Say Gulf Drilling Ban Was A Harsh Blow

Friday, June 03, 2011
Houston Chronicle
by Jennifer A. Dlouhy

The Obama administration's reactions to last year's BP oil spill did more damage than the crude itself, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Gulf Coast employers told a House committee Thursday.

Barbour said little oil reached Mississippi's shores, but the administration's May 2010 decision to impose a five-month ban on most deep-water drilling has left a lasting impact.

The moratorium "not only cost jobs in all the Gulf states, it hurt the economy nationally by reducing domestic oil production," Barbour told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Barbour, a Republican who recently ruled out a presidential bid, added that the government is still moving too slowly in approving deep-water projects.

"This will have a lasting impact on an already out-of-balance oil trade deficit," Barbour said. "Great jobs are being lost."

But Obama's top offshore drilling regulator -- Michael Bromwich, head of the Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement -- testified that the post-spill priority was boosting the safety of oil and gas operations near U.S. coasts.

The ocean energy bureau has approved 55 permits for shallow-water wells since new safety rules were imposed last June.

The agency also has permitted 15 deep-water drilling projects for which applicants were required to prove they could contain oil if an underwater well blew out as BP's Macondo well did.

After the resulting explosion on April 20, 2010, killed 11 Deepwater Horizon drilling rig workers and unleashed a 5-million-barrel oil spill, the administration overhauled the government's oversight of offshore drilling to eliminate possible conflicts of interest.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said those bureaucratic changes and a subsequent slowdown in the permitting of offshore drilling projects exacerbated economic damage from the spill.

"Much of the suffering and loss from the spill was made worse by poor decisions of administration officials," said Issa, the panel chairman. "When the administration did act, its major accomplishment was a hasty bureaucratic reorganization" and an offshore drilling shutdown that has caused "a paralyzing loss of jobs."

Cory Kief, president of Larose, La.-based Offshore Towing, said his tugboat company -- once hired to tow dozens of shallow-water rigs monthly -- has been hit hard by the drilling decline.

"We understand that precious lives were lost, and that an environmental disaster that was some 60 years in the making should not be ignored," Kief said. "However, there was a governmental agency that had a hand to play in this along with the others."

But Bromwich, the ocean energy bureau director, said that even if it takes more time for oil companies to satisfy new safety rules and for regulators to verify their compliance, that's better than the alternative.

"Our new regulations to strengthen drilling safety and protect the environment have required operators to work to make sure they drill safely, and our drilling engineers have to work to ensure compliance with the expanded set of requirements," Bromwich said. "That takes more time than the process that existed previously, when the rules were inadequate and some of our reviews were insufficiently exacting."

"This may be frustrating to some in the industry, but the additional rules and heightened scrutiny are completely appropriate and in the best interest of the nation."

The presidential commission that investigated the Deepwater Horizon disaster found that oil companies lost control of Gulf wells 79 times from 1996 to 2009, Bromwich noted.

"That's 79 near-misses -- 79 almost-Deepwater Horizons," Bromwich said.

It's impossible to reduce risk to zero, he said, "but we have to work constructively to try to manage those risks in a balanced way so we don't impose inappropriately high costs on industry and yet we do raise the bar on safety."

Bromwich added that he "would not have been comfortable" relaunching deep-water drilling after the spill without first strengthening offshore safety rules.

But Barbour argued that the government overreacted -- especially given a history of more than 31,000 oil wells drilled in the Gulf without devastating spills.

Barbour likened the deep-water drilling ban and subsequent safety regulations to outlawing left turns "because they're a little more dangerous."

U.S. economic needs and the urgency of domestic energy production outweigh the risk, Barbour said.

"The risk of one in 31,000 is worth taking when you're talking about something that is so important to the economy of the United States of America," he said.

Copyright (c) 2011, Houston Chronicle

The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Baker Hughes Awarded Deepwater ESP Gig at Chevron's Big Foot Proj.

- Baker Hughes Awarded Deepwater ESP Gig at Chevron's Big Foot Proj.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Baker Hughes Inc.

Chevron has awarded Baker Hughes a contract to supply electrical submersible pumping (ESP) systems and production packers for seven producing wells, plus mud line packers for three injection wells for their Gulf of Mexico deepwater Big Foot Project. This award marks the first deployment of ESP systems inside the wellbore in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The ESP systems will be placed at a true vertical depth of approximately 16,000 feet.

Discovered in 2006, Big Foot is in 5,200 feet of water in the Walker Ridge area of the Gulf of Mexico. The Big Foot production facility will be an extended tension leg platform with an onboard drilling rig and production capacity of 75,000 barrels of oil and 25 million cubic feet of gas. Deployment of the ESP systems is scheduled to begin in 2014.

ESP systems were selected to boost the production stream and maximize asset recovery while extending production life and accelerating recovery. Improved ESP technology and manufacturing controls has extended ESP run times for critical well applications. The 1200 horsepower dual ESP systems will be the highest horsepower in-well systems ever deployed in an offshore environment. The ESP systems are deployed on dual by-pass systems, allowing for reservoir access and the ability to switch between ESPs without intervention.

"Longer-term, the experience and knowledge gained from Big Foot can potentially be applied to other developments in the deepwater market to extend field productivity," said Richard Williams, president of the Gulf of Mexico for Baker Hughes. "We are happy to be working with Chevron on this groundbreaking project to extend the application of ESP technology in the deepwater environment."

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Chevron Spins Bit in GOM

- Chevron Spins Bit in GOM

Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Maersk Oil

Maersk Oil is participating in a new deepwater well in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico after operator Chevron received a drilling permit from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE).

The permit marks the restart of the drilling campaigns Maersk Oil has been a part of in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico after deepwater activities were suspended last year as a consequence of the Deepwater Horizon accident.

"We are very pleased that this permit has been issued as it will allow us to move forward with appraisal activities on the exciting Buckskin prospect," said Bruce Laws, President at Maersk Oil in the U.S.

"The U.S. Gulf of Mexico remains a world class region for exploration and production and we look forward to continuing our work there with our partners."

The Buckskin appraisal well is located in the Keathley Canyon in Block 785, offshore Louisiana, at water depth of 6,540 feet. It is being drilled 8 kilometers from the discovery well that encountered oil in 2008 with drillship Discoverer Deep Seas.

Drilling began on May 16, 2011 and the planned total depth is 29,400 feet. Drilling will last some 136 days.

Chevron is operator of Buckskin, holding a 55% interest with Maersk Oil (20%), Repsol (12.5%) and Samson (12.5%) as co-owners.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Friday, May 20, 2011

BP Gains 2.1% After Settlement Payment From MOEX

- BP Gains 2.1% After Settlement Payment From MOEX



May 20, 2011

BP (NYSE:BP) is higher after the oil major reached a settlement with MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC -- which had a 10% stake in the Macondo oil well -- over claims related to the Deepwater Horizon accident.

BP said MOEX will pay $1.065 billion, which BP will immediately apply to the $20 billion trust it established in the wake of the disaster.

BP said MOEX "has joined BP in recognizing and acknowledging the findings by the Presidential Commission that the accident was the result of a number of separate risk factors, oversights and outright mistakes by multiple parties."

In return for the payment, BP will indemnify MOEX for compensatory claims arising from the accident. MOEX is majority owned by Japan's Mitsui & Co. BP said the agreement is not an admission of liability by any party.

BP shares are up 2.1%, or $0.93, to $44.81.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

BP, MOEX Agree to $1.1B Settlement for Macondo Spill

- BP, MOEX Agree to $1.1B Settlement for Macondo Spill

Friday, May 20, 2011
BP plc

BP has reached agreement with MOEX and its affiliates, Mitsui Oil Exploration and MOEX USA, to settle all claims between the companies related to the Deepwater Horizon accident.

MOEX - which had a ten percent interest in the Macondo well - has joined BP in recognizing and acknowledging the findings by the Presidential Commission that the accident was the result of a number of separate risk factors, oversights and outright mistakes by multiple parties and a number of causes. Like BP, MOEX Offshore has also recognized and acknowledged the conclusions of the United States Coast Guard that, among other things, the safety management systems of both Transocean and its Deepwater Horizon rig had significant deficiencies that rendered them ineffective in preventing the accident. MOEX has concluded that entering into a settlement with BP is in its best interest. The agreement is not an admission of liability by any party regarding the accident.

Under the settlement agreement, MOEX USA Corporation, the parent company of MOEX Offshore 2007, will pay BP $ 1.065 billion. BP will immediately apply the payment to the $20 billion trust it established to meet individual, business and government claims, as well as the cost of the Natural Resource Damages.

The parties have also agreed to mutual releases of claims against each other. BP has agreed to indemnify MOEX for compensatory claims arising from the accident. BP's indemnity excludes civil, criminal or administrative fines and penalties, claims for punitive damages, and certain other claims.

"This settlement is an important step forward for BP and the Gulf communities," said BP group chief executive Bob Dudley. "MOEX is the first company to join BP in helping to meet our shared responsibilities in the Gulf, and Mitsui, through MOEX USA Corporation, is showing great corporate citizenship in standing behind its affiliate and making a contribution to meet the costs of this tragic accident. We call on the other parties involved in the Macondo well to follow the lead of the MOEX and Mitsui parties."

BP and the Mitsui group are committed to enhancing their business relationship globally now that the issues surrounding the Macondo well have been resolved between the two companies.

Today's settlement is the most recent step BP has taken to raise funds to help BP meet its commitments in the Gulf of Mexico. BP has so far concluded agreements for asset divestments totaling approximately $25 billion, and has recently announced that it will also divest a number of operated oil and gas fields in the UK and two of its US refineries - Texas City and Carson - along with their associated marketing interests.

BP is also working to ensure that the other parties involved in the Macondo well - notably, Transocean, which owned and operated the Deepwater Horizon rig; Halliburton, which designed and pumped the unstable cement that the Presidential Commission found was a key cause of the accident; and Anadarko, which owned 25 percent of the project - contribute appropriately. From the outset, BP has committed to paying all legitimate claims and fulfilling its obligations to the Gulf communities under the Oil Pollution Act. To date, BP has paid nearly $6 billion in claims.

The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Latest Deepwater Horizon Headlines

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too