Crude Oil Price by oil-price.net

Oil and Gas Energy News Update

Showing posts with label BOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BOP. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

GL Noble Denton Issues New BOP Guideline

GL Noble Denton Issues New BOP Guideline

Tuesday, May 03, 2011
GL Noble Denton

GL Noble Denton has published a new Guideline for the certification of blow-out preventers (BOPs). The Guideline clearly defines the process to be undertaken by independent third party certification bodies in certifying the integrity of the asset, which monitors and controls the flow of oil and gas wells.

The publication of the Guideline follows the first anniversary of the Macondo oil field incident in the Gulf of Mexico, during which the failure of the BOP from the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig contributed to lost lives and environmental damage. The event has highlighted the crucial need for operators to thoroughly inspect the reliability of this critical piece of safety equipment on a regular basis.

Since the Macondo incident, the oil and gas sector has placed increased emphasis on the inspection and testing of BOPs to ensure compliance with industry standards. The new Guideline published by GL Noble Denton provides rules and procedures for certifying BOPs throughout their lifecycle, from the design and manufacture phase through to annual inspection during operation.

The Guideline will be used by GL Noble Denton as the standard to which the company will inspect and certify BOPs as part of its certification services for sub-sea drilling assets for its clients, who include some of the oil and gas industry's best known exploration and production companies. It has been published using the combined expertise of the GL Group's experienced engineers in Houston, Aberdeen, Sandefjord and Hamburg.

The Guideline is divided into four distinct sections:
  • The general certification process of a blow-out preventer, from the submission of a client's application for certification to the distribution of a certificate after design review and the regular review of the asset's integrity during operation.
  • The procedures that should be undertaken on a BOP to demonstrate its integrity to a third party such as GL Noble Denton, including methods to identify potential failures and their consequences.
  • The major design requirements of a BOP, based on internationally accepted codes and standards.
  • The inspections and tests that should be undertaken throughout the lifecycle of a BOP, including factory acceptance tests, site integration tests, annual inspections and inspections after modification.
Paul Shrieve, GL Noble Denton's Senior Vice President for Technical Assurance, said: "The oil and gas industry has heavily scrutinised its approach to the safe operation of blow-out preventers over the past year. GL Noble Denton has been able to help respond to this by providing a standard for BOP certification that will help operators across the world to demonstrate their integrity and maintain the effective operation of this vital asset."

GL Noble Denton is a global independent provider of technical services and software to the oil and gas industry. The company works with some of the sector's best known corporations to provide a wide range of services across the lifecycle of their assets. GL Noble Denton's expertise spans upstream operations, such as on- and offshore exploration, production and delivery storage; midstream import, storage and processing; and downstream distribution. With over 3,500 employees and a presence more than 80 countries, GL Noble Denton plays a key role in helping to design and develop, operate and execute, and assure some of the industry's most innovative solutions.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Thursday, March 31, 2011

BP Spill Study Says BOP Needs Further Work

BP Spill Study Says BOP Needs Further Work

Thursday, March 31, 2011
Parks Paton Hoepfl & Brown
by  G. Allen Brooks



Last week, the results were released from the forensic study of the blowout preventer (BOP) used on BP Ltd.’s (BP-NYSE) Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico that blew out last year causing an explosion, fire and eventual sinking of the Deepwater Horizon semi-submersible drilling rig and this nation’s greatest offshore environmental accident.

Den Norske Veritas (DNV), the Norwegian engineering and risk-management firm hired by the U.S. Department of the Interior to assess the BOP and determine its role in last year’s Deepwater Horizon disaster, after examining and testing the unit recovered from the ocean floor, prepared a 200-page report with a 351-page appendix.

The inspectors’ conclusion was that the shear ram valves in the BOP were unable to fully sever the drillpipe as the unit is designed to do because the pipe inside buckled from the well’s initial blow-out and was out of alignment that prevented complete closure.

DNV found that the shear rams had closed to within 1.4 inches.  This gap, albeit small, provided sufficient room for an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil to escape.

While the report details the failure, the conclusions confirm the early belief of many drilling engineers consulted about the disaster.

The inability of the shear rams to cut the pipe because of it being off center highlight potential problems for companies drilling over-pressured wells.

The buckling of the pipe was due to the high pressure fluids roaring up the drilling pipe and annulus lifting the pipe until it hit an obstacle.  At that point, the momentum of the pipe and pressures and heat of the flows resulted in its bending.

Exhibit 10.  Why BP’s Macondo Well Spilled Oil
Why BP’s Macondo Well Spilled Oil
Source:  The Wall Street Journal

The report quickly generated further criticism of the offshore oil and gas industry and its safety procedures in drilling deepwater wells that tend to exhibit high formation pressures.

All facets of the oil and oilfield service industry involved in drilling these wells is working on ways to improve the performance of the drilling and safety equipment, especially the BOP.

There still remain unanswered questions about what actually caused the well to blow out and there will be more information and hypotheses presented down the road, but the DNV report was the last major report on the equipment involved in the accident.

The belief of most observers is that the Deepwater Horizon disaster was the result of a confluence of questionable decisions and actions by all parties involved that resulted in the creation of an unbalanced pressure differential between the downhole formation and the equipment designed to hold back that pressure.

Criticism of the DNV report came immediately from political opponents of offshore drilling including Rep. Edward Markey (D., Mass.) who said, “This report calls into question whether oil-industry claims about the effectiveness of blowout preventers are just a bunch of hot air.”  The man responsible for overseeing U.S. offshore drilling rules until he retired in 2009, Elmer Danenberger III, was quoted by The Wall Street Journal as saying, “They have to rethink the whole design,” meaning the BOP.

The DNV report concluded that the BOP failure was due to a design flaw and not the operation, abuse or maintenance of the BOP by the companies involved in drilling the Macondo well.

The BOP in question was manufactured by Cameron International (CAM-NYSE), the leading provider to the drilling industry of such units for over 90 years.  The BOP has been the industry’s last and best defense against well pressures, which often came as a result of encountering pockets of higher-pressured natural gas at shallower depths while drilling a well.  In fact, the BOP that became the signature product for Cameron was developed in response to several high-pressure well workover accidents in 1922.

The co-founder and majority owner of then Cameron Iron Works, James Abercrombie, was also a successful contract driller with a history of putting out well fires and blow-outs, long before Red Adair made the occupation of fire-fighting glamorous.

In late 1921, Mr. Abercrombie secured a contract to work over a troublesome well in the Hull field in Liberty County, northeast of Houston.  This was a field with many small pockets of high pressured gas.  In the course of working over wells in this field, Mr. Abercrombie’s company had lost its newest and best rig and had encountered three blowouts.

While each of the blowouts resulted in lost equipment, fortunately no one was hurt.

The episode, however, focused Mr. Abercrombie on ways to design equipment that could be used to prevent wells from blowing out.

Originally, he had used an elementary blowout preventer called a “boll weevil.”  It was essentially a piece of heavy-gauge pipe surrounded by a thick lead casing.  There was stopcock on top of the arrangement.  If it was suspected that a well might blowout, the unit was slipped over the well’s casing and the stopcock closed.  The unit proved impractical as a well containment device but mainly it was used to try to give the drilling workers time to get away from the rig before the well blew.

There was another preventer on the market designed to improve on the “boll weevil” and Mr. Abercrombie purchased one of them to use on his next well workover in the Hull field.  Unfortunately it, too, failed to prevent another blowout.  Mr. Abercrombie came up with the idea of a ram-type preventer with the faces of the rams closing in on the drillpipe in order to close off the pressure in the well.  With a sketch of the concept, Mr. Abercrombie went to his co-founder and partner, Henry Cameron, the next morning and sketched out his concept in the sawdust and dirt of the machine shop’s floor.  With a casting produced by Howard Hughes’ nearby shop, Mr. Cameron machined the design.

A patent application was filed on April 14, 1922, but patent number 1,569,247 was not issued until January 12, 1926.

As the unit was tested it was discovered that it leaked when pressure increased.  Mr. Cameron designed a fix whereby the increasing pressure would force open a notch in the corner of the ram face and force it to close tighter.  Patent number 1,498,610 was issued as a modification to the original BOP design but before the original patent was even granted.

By adding steel and cast iron parts to the BOP and being able to guarantee the unit would work to shut off 2,000 pounds of flowing pressure, the orders started coming in, not only from domestic companies in Texas, Louisiana and California, but also for use in foreign locations such as Mexico and Venezuela.  The Cameron Iron Works company was on its way to a glorious history that continues today.  [Much of this history about Cameron comes from the book, Mr. Jim, by Patrick J. Nicholson.]

We have high confidence that the engineers in the drilling business will figure out how to improve the performance and safety of the drilling process, just as they have for the past 150+ years.  Well control episodes have occurred throughout the history of the petroleum industry.  The Deepwater Horizon was the latest and most devastating, both due to the loss of 11 lives and the environmental damage to the Gulf of Mexico from the oil spill.

The evidence from the investigations of the disaster continues to show the Macondo well blowout was an accident.  All aspects of our daily lives, including the energy, involve risks.  We need to better understand the risks and their potential ramifications.  Importantly, we need to keep a perspective on risk and our risk tolerance.  We don’t stop driving after a car accident.  We don’t stop flying after a plane accident.  We shouldn’t stop drilling after a drilling accident.