Crude Oil Price by oil-price.net

Oil and Gas Energy News Update

Showing posts with label Who. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Who. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

WHO says Cellphones may cause Cancer

- WHO says Cellphones may cause Cancer



May 31, 2011

Lead, engine exhaust and chloroform have a new member joining them in the carcinogenic hazard category...cell phones. The World Health Organization now lists mobile phone use to the list.
A team of 31 scientists from 14 countries, including the United States, made the decision after reviewing peer-reviewed studies on cell phone safety. The team found enough evidence to categorize personal exposure as "possibly carcinogenic to humans." What that means is that right now there haven't been enough long-term studies conducted to make a clear conclusion if radiation from cell phones are safe, but there is enough data showing a possible connection that consumers should be alerted. The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing which is similar to a very low-powered microwave oven. The European Environmental Agency has pushed for more studies, saying cell phones could be as big a public health risk as smoking, asbestos and leaded gasoline. Manufacturers of many popular cell phones already warn consumers to keep their device away from their body and at a safe distance when in use.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Drilling Impact Fee Won't Go To Those Who Ban It

- Drilling Impact Fee Won't Go To Those Who Ban It

Thursday, May 19, 2011
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News
by Brad Bumsted, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Local governments that want to share revenue from a proposed impact fee on natural gas drilling cannot adopt more stringent zoning regulations than a statewide "model ordinance" called for in a Senate bill.

The provision is aimed at Pittsburgh, which banned drilling, and any other municipalities that would do the same, said Andrew Crompton, chief counsel for Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County, the bill's author.

"It's mainly to make sure the city of Pittsburgh and any others that have explicitly zoned out shale are not getting rewarded by getting a share of the (drilling) fee," Crompton said.

The way the bill is structured Pittsburgh wouldn't be eligible for the local share of the money, which goes to communities in or near drilling sites, but it would otherwise be eligible for statewide revenue the bill provides, Crompton said.

Ben Price, project director for the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, which drafted Pittsburgh's no-drilling ordinance, called the revenue "blood money" that requires municipalities to abrogate their authority to protect communities in order to get state revenue. He claimed the gas industry drafted the Scarnati bill, which Crompton denied.

The Public Utility Commission would develop the model zoning ordinance, which would permit drilling "by right" in all but residentially zoned areas.

Crompton said he suspects the commission would rely on a model zoning proposal used by the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors.

"We put a model ordinance out to members so they can properly plan for (drilling)," said Elam Herr, an official with the supervisors association. The group is still reviewing Scarnati's bill, Herr said, but has no problem with preventing revenue from going to municipalities that ban drilling.

Scarnati on Monday introduced the bill, which would impose a $10,000-per-well fee on deep gas sites, with potential revenue much higher depending on the price of gas and volume produced by the well.

The legislation would bring in $121.2 million in revenue by March 1, 2012. The first $7.5 million would go to conservation districts. The split after that would be 60 percent to counties and municipalities and 40 percent for statewide grants on projects such as roads, stormwater and sewer systems and protecting open space.

But the bill faces hurdles: Gov. Tom Corbett has said he would consider an impact fee, but the money must remain local and not come to Harrisburg. The Republican-controlled House has shown no appetite for a statewide fee or tax. There are six other tax or fee proposals on Marcellus shale drilling.

Copyright (c) 2011, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too