Shale Plays, Foreign Investments Drive U.S. Oil & Gas M&A Value

- Shale Plays, Foreign Investments Drive U.S. Oil & Gas M&A Value

Thursday, August 11, 2011
PwC

Ongoing interest in shale acreage, deals for midstream assets and increased investments from foreign buyers in the U.S. oil and gas industry helped drive U.S. oil and gas mergers and acquisitions (M&A) value to $39 billion in the second quarter of 2011, according to PwC US.

In the second quarter of 2011, there were 51 deals with values greater than $50 million, compared to 61 announced deals totaling $41 billion in the same period last year. While the volume and value of transactions dipped slightly in the second quarter of 2011 when compared to the same period last year, average deal value for deals over $50 million jumped to $765 million in the second quarter 2011, a 14 percent increase over the same period last year when average deal value was $672 million.

"There continues to be steady M&A activity in the oil and gas sector with strong competition for prized assets, which has maintained the deal momentum throughout the first half of the year. The second half of the year has already kicked off with one mega deal announced, and we expect that deal momentum to continue," said Rick Roberge, principal in PwC's energy M&A practice. "Foreign and private equity interest in North American oil and gas assets remains very high and will likely be a driver of ongoing activity."

Foreign buyers announced 18 deals valued at over $50 million or more in the second quarter of 2011, which contributed $36.2 billion or 72 percent of total deal value, versus 27 deals valued at $24.2 billion in the same period last year.

For deals valued at over $50 million, there were 11 midstream deals that accounted for $19.9 billion, or 51 percent of total deal value, compared to six deals worth $3.4 billion in the same period last year. Transactions in the upstream space led all oil and gas subsectors with 26 deals, or 51 percent of volume in the second quarter.

According to PwC, seven of the top 10 deals by value in the second quarter of 2011 were related to shale plays, including four upstream deals and three transactions in the midstream and oil field services space. For all deals greater than $50 million, there were 10 shale-related transactions totaling $7.5 billion, or 19 percent of total deal value, including two deals involving the Marcellus Shale totaling $2.3 billion.

"Shale-gas assets continue to be very attractive acquisition targets as multinationals look to gain technical know-how and exploit the long-term value and opportunities from rising energy needs," said Steve Haffner, a Pittsburgh-based partner with PwC's energy practice. "At the same time, there is tremendous activity developing around natural gas infrastructure, which is necessary to move the extracted gas to market. The U.S. 'shale gale' continues to attract the attention of global companies."

There were five financial sponsor-backed transactions over $50 million, representing $6.1 billion, or 16 percent of total deal value, compared to 10 financial sponsor deals contributing $6.2 billion during the same period last year. During the first six months of 2011, there were 16 financial sponsor deals contributing $20.6 billion, a whopping 129 percent increase in deal value, compared to the first half of 2010 when there were 15 financial sponsor-backed deals, valued at $9.0 billion.

"With oil prices hovering at $100, private equity funds continue to make a very strong push in the oil and gas sector," added Roberge. "The private equity deal makers, who used to largely play in the midstream space, are now heavily involved in exploration and production (E&P), shale plays, and oil field services and equipment sector. However, along with the great opportunities and rewards of investing in oil and gas, there is still risk in this space – and new entrants need to understand the pitfalls before trying to exploit these possible opportunities."

For deals with values greater than $50 million, there were 18 corporate transactions totaling $26.8 billion or 69 percent of total second quarter deal value, compared to 22 deals that accounted for $25.9 billion in deal value in the same period last year. Thirty-three asset deals for a combined total of $12.2 billion were announced in the second quarter of 2011, versus 39 deals totaling $15.1 billion in the same period last year. However, when comparing the first six months of 2011 to the first half of 2010, the number of corporate transactions increased by three deals to 35 transactions, while total corporate deal value jumped 26 percent to $59.7 billion in 2011 from $47.6 billion in 2010.

Another potential driver for M&A activity is the desire from some oil companies to sell assets and break apart key lines of business, according to PwC.

"We believe that another factor to keep a close eye on throughout the year, which may add to the already robust M&A activity we're seeing, is the trend of integrated oil companies looking at the various options to unlock shareholder value through separating their E&P businesses," said Roberge. "While this trend could be a very positive driver of M&A activity, these are highly complex transactions with potential consequences around tax considerations, valuations and financial reporting. Companies should consider the risk with these types of transactions as every potential scenario needs to be thoroughly and diligently evaluated to succeed."

PwC's Oil & Gas M&A analysis is a quarterly report of announced U.S. transactions with value greater than $50 million analyzed by PwC using transaction data from John S. Herold, Inc.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

How Dependent Is the U.S. on Foreign Oil? - EIA Reports Current Trends

- How Dependent Is the U.S. on Foreign Oil? - EIA Reports Current Trends

Thursday, July 14, 2011
Rigzone Staff
by Barbara Saunders

The U.S. imported about 49 percent of the crude oil and refined petroleum products that were consumed during 2010, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) noted in a recent brief on the issue.

About half of these imports came from the Western Hemisphere, EIA said, adding that U.S. dependence on foreign petroleum has declined since peaking in 2005.

Canada is the United States' leading crude oil supplier, EIA reported.

Consumption, Production and Import Patterns

The U.S. consumed 19.1 million barrels per day (MMbd) of petroleum products during 2010, making it the world's largest petroleum consumer, EIA said.

The U.S. was third in crude oil production at 5.5 MMbd. But since crude oil alone does not constitute all U.S. petroleum supplies. " . . . [B]ecause crude oil expands in the refining process, liquid fuel is captured in the processing of natural gas, and there are other sources of liquid fuel, including biofuels," EIA observed, reporting that these additional supplies totaled 4.2 MMbd in 2010.

In 2010, the U.S. imported 11.8 million barrels per day (MMbd) of crude oil and refined petroleum products. The U.S., however, also exported 2.3 MMbd of crude oil and petroleum products during 2010, so net imports (imports minus exports) equaled 9.4 MMbd, EIA noted.

Petroleum products imported by the United States during 2010 included gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil, jet fuel, chemical feedstocks, asphalt, and other products. Still, most petroleum products consumed in the United States were refined here. Net imports of petroleum other than crude oil were 2 percent of the petroleum consumed in the United States during 2010, according to EIA.

About Half of U.S. Petroleum Imports from Western Hemisphere

Of the total crude oil and petroleum product imports, 49 percent came from the Western Hemisphere (North, South, and Central America, and the Caribbean including U.S. territories) during 2010. About 18 percent of U.S. crude and imports of crude oil and petroleum products come from the Persian Gulf countries of Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates. The U.S.' largest sources of net crude oil and petroleum product imports were Canada and Saudi Arabia, EIA said.

Reliance on Petroleum Imports has Declined

U.S. dependence on imported oil has dramatically declined since peaking in 2005, EIA emphasized.

"This trend is the result of a variety of factors including a decline in consumption and shifts in supply patterns," EIA said, continuing: "The economic downturn after the financial crisis of 2008, improvements in efficiency, changes in consumer behavior and patterns of economic growth, all contributed to the decline in petroleum consumption. At the same time, increased use of domestic biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel), and strong gains in domestic production of crude oil and natural gas plant liquids expanded domestic supplies and reduced the need for imports."

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too
LINK

Foreign Scientists in East Java to Study Lapindo Mudflow

- Foreign Scientists in East Java to Study Lapindo Mudflow

Thursday, May 26, 2011
Asia Pulse Pte Ltd.

Scientists from a few foreign countries including Germany and Britain have arrived in Sidoarjo to observe and study the center of the 5-year-old Lapindo mudflow in the Porong area.

"We have come here to observe from close quarters the conditions of the Lapindo mudflow," Jeffrey Richard, executive director of Humanitus, said on Wednesday.

The center of the mudflow is located near the Banjar Panji I well drilled by Lapindo Brantas oil and gas company in Porong.

The scientists would study the hot mud that has been surging from a hole in the ground for the past five years without any sign of abating.

"We have assembled scientists from several countries who will try to determine what had created the continuing mudflow considered to be the biggest of its kind in the world," Jeffrey said.

He said it had been estimated the phenomenon could last for up to 25 to 30 more years.

All the members of the scientists team would each do their individual observations on the mudflow`s center and later meet to discuss their findings.

There had so far been a difference of views among geologists about what caused the mudflow. Some of them had said the mudflow came into being by a drilling mistake but others attributed it to a natural development.

British geologist Richard Davies was "99 percent" convinced the mudflow had been caused by a drilling mistake.

"We will also conduct a further study on what impacts the mudflow will have in the future," Davies said.

Meanwhile, Russian geologist Sergey Kadurin said the mudflow was a result of a natural occurrence, as had been the case in similar phenomena in other countries.

"It could have been related to the existence of an underground volcano in the past that had been forgotten by the local populace," he said.

The results of the studies of the foreign scientists would eventually be written down and published in a book.

(C) 2011 Asia Pulse Pte Ltd.

Oil & Gas Post

Promote Your Page Too